History - From Trade to Territory – CBSE NCERT Study Resources

Previous Chapter Next Chapter
History - From Trade to Territory

Study Materials

8th

8th - Social Studies

History - From Trade to Territory

Jump to Question Sets

Overview of the Chapter

This chapter explores how the British East India Company transitioned from a trading entity to a territorial power in India. It covers key events like the Battle of Plassey, the establishment of British rule, and the administrative changes introduced by the Company.

From Trade to Territory: The process through which the British East India Company expanded its influence from commercial activities to political control over large parts of India.

Key Topics Covered

  • The arrival of European trading companies in India
  • The rise of the British East India Company
  • Major battles and treaties that led to British dominance
  • Administrative systems introduced by the Company

European Trading Companies in India

European powers like the Portuguese, Dutch, French, and British arrived in India for trade. The British East India Company gained a strong foothold through strategic alliances and military victories.

East India Company: A British trading company established in 1600 that eventually became a political power in India.

Battles and Expansion

The Battle of Plassey (1757) and the Battle of Buxar (1764) were turning points that established British supremacy. The Company used the 'Divide and Rule' policy to weaken Indian rulers.

Administrative Changes

The Company introduced new revenue systems like the Permanent Settlement and the Ryotwari System. It also established courts and a new administrative framework.

Permanent Settlement: A land revenue system introduced by the British in Bengal, fixing taxes permanently with zamindars.

Conclusion

By the mid-19th century, the British East India Company had transformed from a trading enterprise to the dominant political authority in India, laying the foundation for colonial rule.

All Question Types with Solutions – CBSE Exam Pattern

Explore a complete set of CBSE-style questions with detailed solutions, categorized by marks and question types. Ideal for exam preparation, revision and practice.

Very Short Answer (1 Mark) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These are 1-mark questions requiring direct, concise answers. Ideal for quick recall and concept clarity.

Question 1:
Who granted Diwani rights to the British in 1765?
Answer:

Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II.

Question 2:
Name the first English factory established in India.
Answer:

Surat (1619).

Question 3:
Which battle marked the beginning of British rule in India?
Answer:

Battle of Plassey (1757).

Question 4:
Who was the ruler of Bengal during the Battle of Plassey?
Answer:

Siraj-ud-Daulah.

Question 5:
What was the main reason for the Anglo-Mysore Wars?
Answer:

Control over South India.

Question 6:
Who introduced the Doctrine of Lapse?
Answer:

Lord Dalhousie.

Question 7:
Which Indian state was annexed under the Doctrine of Lapse?
Answer:

Satara (1848).

Question 8:
What was the result of the Battle of Buxar (1764)?
Answer:

British control over Bengal.

Question 9:
Name the governor-general who introduced the Subsidiary Alliance.
Answer:

Lord Wellesley.

Question 10:
Which Indian ruler accepted the Subsidiary Alliance first?
Answer:

Nizam of Hyderabad (1798).

Question 11:
What was the purpose of the East India Company's army?
Answer:

Protect trade and expand territory.

Question 12:
Which treaty ended the First Anglo-Maratha War?
Answer:

Treaty of Salbai (1782).

Question 13:
Who led the revolt against the British in 1857?
Answer:

Indian soldiers (sepoys).

Question 14:
What was the outcome of the Revolt of 1857?
Answer:

British Crown took over India.

Question 15:
What was the main reason for the Battle of Plassey in 1757?
Answer:

The main reason for the Battle of Plassey was the conflict between the British East India Company and Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal, over trade privileges and political control.

Question 16:
Name the treaty signed after the Battle of Buxar in 1764.
Answer:

The treaty signed after the Battle of Buxar was the Treaty of Allahabad in 1765.

Question 17:
Who introduced the Doctrine of Lapse and what was its purpose?
Answer:

Lord Dalhousie introduced the Doctrine of Lapse. Its purpose was to annex Indian states if the ruler died without a male heir, expanding British control.

Question 18:
What was the significance of the Charter Act of 1813?
Answer:

The Charter Act of 1813 ended the East India Company's monopoly over trade in India, allowing other British traders to enter the Indian market.

Question 19:
Which governor-general introduced the Permanent Settlement system in Bengal?
Answer:

Lord Cornwallis introduced the Permanent Settlement system in Bengal in 1793.

Question 20:
What was the main objective of the Subsidiary Alliance system?
Answer:

The main objective of the Subsidiary Alliance was to bring Indian states under British control by making them dependent on the British for military protection.

Question 21:
Name the Mughal emperor during the Revolt of 1857.
Answer:

Bahadur Shah Zafar II was the Mughal emperor during the Revolt of 1857.

Question 22:
What was the immediate cause of the Revolt of 1857?
Answer:

The immediate cause was the introduction of the Enfield rifle, whose cartridges were rumored to be greased with cow and pig fat, offending Hindu and Muslim soldiers.

Question 23:
Who was the first Governor-General of India under the British Crown?
Answer:

Lord Canning was the first Governor-General of India under the British Crown after the Revolt of 1857.

Question 24:
What was the Ryotwari System introduced by the British?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was a land revenue system where farmers (ryots) paid taxes directly to the British government, bypassing landlords.

Question 25:
Which British policy led to the decline of Indian handicrafts?
Answer:

The British industrial policy and heavy taxes on Indian goods led to the decline of Indian handicrafts, as machine-made British goods became cheaper.

Question 26:
What was the role of the Board of Control established in 1784?
Answer:

The Board of Control was set up to oversee the East India Company's political activities in India, ensuring British government supervision.

Very Short Answer (2 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 2-mark questions test key concepts in a brief format. Answers are expected to be accurate and slightly descriptive.

Question 1:
What was the Doctrine of Lapse introduced by Lord Dalhousie?
Answer:

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy where the British annexed Indian states if the ruler died without a natural heir. This policy was used to expand British territory, as seen in the annexation of Satara, Nagpur, and Jhansi.

Question 2:
Who was the first Governor-General of India under the British rule?
Answer:

The first Governor-General of India was Warren Hastings (1773–1785). He introduced administrative reforms and consolidated British power in India.

Question 3:
What role did the East India Company play in India before 1857?
Answer:

The East India Company started as a trading body but gradually gained political control. It:
1. Established trade monopolies.
2. Fought wars to expand territories.
3. Introduced revenue and administrative systems.
By 1857, it ruled most of India indirectly.

Question 4:
Name two major rebellions against British rule before 1857.
Answer:

Two major rebellions were:
1. Sannyasi Rebellion (1770s) in Bengal.
2. Paika Rebellion (1817) in Odisha.
Both were protests against British economic policies and land revenue systems.

Question 5:
What was the impact of British land revenue policies on Indian farmers?
Answer:

British land revenue policies like the Permanent Settlement, Ryotwari, and Mahalwari systems often led to:
1. Heavy taxation.
2. Peasant indebtedness.
3. Loss of land ownership.
Farmers faced extreme hardship under these policies.

Question 6:
Why did the British promote English education in India?
Answer:

The British promoted English education to:
1. Create a class of Indians loyal to British rule.
2. Train clerks and administrators for their government.
3. Spread Western ideas and culture, as seen in the Macaulay Minute (1835).

Short Answer (3 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 3-mark questions require brief explanations and help assess understanding and application of concepts.

Question 1:
Explain the significance of the Battle of Plassey in the establishment of British power in India.
Answer:

The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a turning point in Indian history as it marked the beginning of British political control in India. Robert Clive defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal, with the help of Mir Jafar's betrayal.

This victory gave the British East India Company control over Bengal's wealth, which they used to strengthen their military and administrative power. It also set the stage for further expansion of British rule in India.

Question 2:
Describe the role of the East India Company in transforming from a trading body to a territorial power.
Answer:

The East India Company initially came to India for trade but gradually gained political control.

  • It secured trading rights through farmans (royal orders) from Mughal emperors.
  • After winning the Battle of Plassey (1757) and Buxar (1764), it became the diwan of Bengal, controlling revenue.
  • Through wars and alliances (like the Subsidiary Alliance), it annexed territories, becoming a ruling power.

Question 3:
What were the main reasons for the decline of the Mughal Empire, which allowed the British to take over?
Answer:

The decline of the Mughal Empire was due to:

  • Weak successors after Aurangzeb, who lacked administrative skills.
  • Economic crises due to constant wars and corruption.
  • Rise of regional powers like Marathas and Sikhs, weakening central authority.
  • British manipulation of divisions among Indian rulers to expand control.

Question 4:
How did the Subsidiary Alliance system benefit the British and harm Indian rulers?
Answer:

The Subsidiary Alliance, introduced by Lord Wellesley, forced Indian rulers to:

  • Accept British military protection and keep British troops in their territory.
  • Pay for the maintenance of these troops, which often led to financial strain.
  • Lose independence as they couldn’t wage wars or negotiate without British permission.
This system helped the British control kingdoms without direct administration.

Question 5:
Explain the impact of British land revenue policies like the Permanent Settlement on Indian farmers.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed land revenue permanently with zamindars, who acted as intermediaries.

  • Farmers suffered as zamindars demanded high rents, leading to debt and poverty.
  • Many lost land due to inability to pay, while zamindars became wealthy.
  • This system discouraged agricultural improvements, as zamindars had no incentive to invest.
It created long-term exploitation of peasants.

Question 6:
Describe the role of the Doctrine of Lapse in the expansion of British territories in India.
Answer:

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie (1848-1856) to annex Indian states if the ruler died without a natural heir.

Key impacts:

  • States like Satara, Jhansi, and Nagpur were annexed.
  • It angered Indian rulers and contributed to the Revolt of 1857.
  • Helped the British expand their territories without wars.

Question 7:
How did the subsidiary alliance system help the British control Indian rulers?
Answer:

The subsidiary alliance, introduced by Lord Wellesley, forced Indian rulers to accept British military protection and a British resident in their court.

Key effects:

  • Rulers lost sovereignty and paid for British troops.
  • They couldn’t form alliances or wage wars independently.
  • Examples: Hyderabad (1798) and Awadh (1801) were weakened under this system.

Question 8:
What were the economic consequences of British land revenue policies like the Permanent Settlement?
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed land revenue demands permanently with zamindars, leading to:

  • Heavy burden on peasants as zamindars extracted high rents.
  • Many peasants lost lands due to inability to pay.
  • Zamindars became loyal to the British but neglected agriculture.
This policy ruined traditional rural economies and increased poverty.

Question 9:
Why did the Marathas emerge as a major challenge to the British in the 18th century?
Answer:

The Marathas were a powerful confederacy under leaders like Shivaji and later the Peshwas. They challenged the British because:

  • They controlled vast territories in central and western India.
  • Their military strength and guerrilla tactics were formidable.
  • The British saw them as obstacles to their expansion.
The Anglo-Maratha Wars (1775-1818) eventually crushed their power.

Question 10:
Explain how the trade monopoly of the British East India Company affected Indian weavers and artisans.
Answer:

The Company’s trade monopoly destroyed Indian handicrafts:

  • Weavers were forced to sell at low prices due to fixed contracts.
  • Heavy duties on Indian goods made them uncompetitive.
  • British machine-made goods flooded markets, ruining local industries.
This led to widespread unemployment and poverty among artisans.

Long Answer (5 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 5-mark questions are descriptive and require detailed, structured answers with proper explanation and examples.

Question 1:
Explain how the East India Company transformed from a trading entity to a territorial power in India.
Answer:
Historical Context

We studied that the East India Company arrived in India in 1600 for trade but gradually gained political control.

Key Developments
  • Victory in the Battle of Plassey (1757) gave them control over Bengal.
  • The Diwani rights (1765) allowed revenue collection.
  • Annexation of states like Awadh expanded their territory.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows how farmers suffered under heavy taxes, and local rulers lost power.

Current Relevance

This shift laid the foundation for British colonial rule in India.

Question 2:
Describe the role of Tipu Sultan in resisting British expansion in South India.
Answer:
Historical Context

We learned that Tipu Sultan, ruler of Mysore, fiercely opposed the British in the late 18th century.

Key Developments
  • He modernized his army with French help.
  • Fought four Anglo-Mysore Wars but was defeated in 1799.
  • Used rockets in warfare, surprising the British.
Socio-economic Impact

His resistance delayed British control over South India for decades.

Current Relevance

Today, he is remembered as a symbol of anti-colonial struggle.

Question 3:
How did the Doctrine of Lapse help the British expand their territories in India?
Answer:
Historical Context

Our textbook explains that Lord Dalhousie introduced this policy in 1848 to annex Indian states.

Key Developments
  • States like Satara (1848) and Jhansi (1853) were annexed.
  • If a ruler died without a male heir, the state lapsed to the British.
  • This angered many Indian rulers and fueled the 1857 revolt.
Socio-economic Impact

It disrupted traditional succession laws and created unrest.

Current Relevance

This policy shows how legal tricks were used for colonial expansion.

Question 4:
Analyze the economic changes brought by British rule through the Permanent Settlement.
Answer:
Historical Context

We studied that the Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed land revenue demands in Bengal.

Key Developments
  • Zamindars became landowners but had to pay fixed revenue.
  • Peasants suffered as rents increased while productivity declined.
  • Our textbook mentions frequent famines due to this system.
Socio-economic Impact

It created a new landlord class but ruined traditional agriculture.

Current Relevance

This system influenced later land reforms in independent India.

Question 5:
What were the consequences of the Battle of Buxar (1764) on Mughal authority and British power?
Answer:
Historical Context

The battle was fought between the British and combined forces of Mughals, Nawabs, and Shuja-ud-Daula.

Key Developments
  • British victory established their military supremacy.
  • Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II became a British pensioner.
  • Our textbook shows it led to the Diwani rights grant in 1765.
Socio-economic Impact

Mughal authority weakened while British controlled Bengal's wealth.

Current Relevance

This battle marked the beginning of political dominance by the British.

Question 6:
How did the Doctrine of Lapse help the British expand their territory in India?
Answer:
Historical Context

We studied that Lord Dalhousie introduced this policy to annex Indian states.

Key Developments
  • States like Satara, Jhansi, and Nagpur were annexed.
  • It denied rulers without natural heirs the right to adopt successors.
  • This led to rebellions like the Revolt of 1857.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows how it disrupted local governance and economies.

Current Relevance

The policy remains a controversial example of colonial exploitation.

Question 7:
Analyze the impact of British land revenue policies on Indian farmers.
Answer:
Historical Context

We learned that the British introduced harsh revenue systems.

Key Developments
  • The Permanent Settlement in Bengal fixed high taxes.
  • The Ryotwari System exploited individual farmers.
  • The Mahalwari System burdened village communities.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows how farmers faced debt and famines.

Current Relevance

These policies highlight the exploitation of colonial rule.

Question 8:
Discuss the significance of the Battle of Plassey (1757) in British colonial expansion.
Answer:
Historical Context

We studied that this battle marked the start of British political control.

Key Developments
  • Robert Clive defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah with treachery.
  • The British gained control over Bengal's revenue.
  • It paved the way for further conquests.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook mentions how it led to economic exploitation of Bengal.

Current Relevance

The battle is a turning point in India's colonial history.

Question 9:
How did the subsidiary alliance system help the British expand their territory?
Answer:
Historical Context

Our textbook explains that Lord Wellesley introduced this policy in 1798.

Key Developments
  • Indian rulers had to accept British troops and pay for them.
  • States like Hyderabad and Awadh became dependent.
  • It prevented alliances against the British, as seen in the Maratha Wars.
Socio-economic Impact

Rulers lost autonomy, and heavy financial burdens led to peasant unrest.

Current Relevance

This system weakened Indian kingdoms, easing British dominance.

Question 10:
Analyze the impact of the Doctrine of Lapse on Indian princely states.
Answer:
Historical Context

We studied that Lord Dalhousie used this policy (1848-1856) to annex states.

Key Developments
  • States like Satara, Nagpur, and Jhansi were annexed.
  • Our textbook shows how adopted heirs were denied succession rights.
  • It caused resentment, leading to the 1857 Revolt.
Socio-economic Impact

Displaced rulers and nobles joined anti-British movements.

Current Relevance

This policy exposed British exploitation, uniting Indians against them.

Question 11:
Discuss the significance of the Battle of Buxar in consolidating British power.
Answer:
Historical Context

We learned that the 1764 battle involved the British, Mughals, and Nawabs.

Key Developments
  • The British defeated combined forces of Mir Qasim, Shuja-ud-Daula, and the Mughal emperor.
  • Our textbook highlights the Diwani rights gained over Bengal.
  • It established British military supremacy in eastern India.
Socio-economic Impact

Peasants faced harsh taxation under the new administration.

Current Relevance

This battle marked the start of formal British political control.

Question 12:
Explain how the Battle of Plassey (1757) became a turning point in the history of British expansion in India. Discuss its political and economic consequences.
Answer:

The Battle of Plassey (1757) marked a significant shift in British control over India. It was fought between the British East India Company, led by Robert Clive, and the Nawab of Bengal, Siraj-ud-Daulah. The British victory was largely due to the betrayal by Mir Jafar, Siraj-ud-Daulah's commander.

Political Consequences:

  • The British gained control over Bengal, making it their first major territorial acquisition.
  • Mir Jafar was installed as a puppet ruler, ensuring British influence in Bengal's administration.
  • It established British military supremacy and paved the way for further expansions.

Economic Consequences:

  • The British gained access to Bengal's vast resources, including its revenue system.
  • The Drain of Wealth began as Bengal's riches were sent to Britain.
  • It strengthened the East India Company's financial position, enabling further conquests.

Thus, the battle was a turning point as it laid the foundation for British colonial rule in India.

Question 13:
Describe the Doctrine of Lapse introduced by Lord Dalhousie. How did it contribute to the expansion of British territories in India? Provide examples.
Answer:

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie (1848–1856) to annex Indian states if the ruler died without a natural heir. According to this doctrine, the British refused to recognize adopted heirs, claiming the state would 'lapse' (merge) into British territory.

This policy contributed to British expansion in the following ways:

  • It allowed the British to annex states like Satara (1848), Jhansi (1854), and Nagpur (1854) without war.
  • It created resentment among Indian rulers, as it disregarded traditional succession practices.
  • The annexation of Awadh (1856) under false pretenses further angered Indians, contributing to the Revolt of 1857.

The Doctrine of Lapse was a key tool for the British to expand their control, but it also sowed seeds of discontent among Indian rulers and people.

Question 14:
Explain the role of the East India Company in transforming from a trading entity to a territorial power in India. Discuss key events that facilitated this transition.
Answer:

The East India Company initially arrived in India as a trading entity under a charter from Queen Elizabeth I in 1600. However, over time, it transformed into a territorial power due to several key events:

  • Battle of Plassey (1757): The Company, led by Robert Clive, defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal, with the help of Mir Jafar's betrayal. This victory gave the Company control over Bengal's revenue and marked its shift from trade to political dominance.
  • Diwani Rights (1765): After the Battle of Buxar, the Mughal Emperor granted the Company the Diwani (revenue collection rights) of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. This allowed the Company to collect taxes, strengthening its financial and administrative control.
  • Subsidiary Alliance (1798): Introduced by Lord Wellesley, this policy forced Indian rulers to accept British protection and pay for maintaining British troops. It gradually eroded the sovereignty of Indian states, expanding the Company's territorial influence.

These events, along with the Company's military strength and diplomatic strategies, enabled its transition from a trading corporation to a ruling power in India.

Question 15:
Describe the administrative changes introduced by the British after the Battle of Buxar (1764). How did these changes consolidate their power in India?
Answer:

After the Battle of Buxar (1764), the British introduced significant administrative changes to consolidate their power:

  • Dual Government (1765-1772): The Company controlled revenue collection (Diwani) while the Nawab retained judicial and administrative duties, creating a system of indirect rule.
  • Permanent Settlement (1793): Introduced by Lord Cornwallis, it fixed land revenue demands, ensuring steady income for the Company and creating a loyal class of zamindars.
  • Judicial Reforms: The establishment of civil and criminal courts under British supervision replaced traditional systems, centralizing legal authority.

These changes weakened local rulers, streamlined revenue collection, and established British dominance over India's governance and economy.

Question 16:
Describe the administrative changes introduced by the British after the Battle of Plassey and how they impacted Indian society and economy.
Answer:

After the Battle of Plassey (1757), the British introduced significant administrative changes that reshaped India:

  • Dual Government (1765-1772): The Company controlled revenue collection (Diwani) while the Nawab retained judicial and administrative powers. This led to exploitation as revenue was extracted ruthlessly, causing famines.
  • Permanent Settlement (1793): Introduced by Lord Cornwallis, it fixed land revenue permanently with zamindars, creating a class of landlords loyal to the British but oppressive to peasants.
  • Introduction of Western Education: The British promoted English education through acts like the Charter Act of 1813, creating a new elite class but eroding traditional Indian learning systems.

These changes disrupted Indian agrarian systems, drained wealth, and altered social hierarchies, consolidating British control while impoverishing local economies.

Question 17:
Describe the administrative changes introduced by the British after the Battle of Plassey and how they consolidated their power in India.
Answer:

After the Battle of Plassey (1757), the British introduced several administrative changes to consolidate their power in India:

  • Dual Government (1765-1772): The Company took control of revenue collection (Diwani) while leaving administration (Nizamat) to Indian officials. This allowed the British to exploit resources without direct responsibility, leading to economic drain and suffering in Bengal.
  • Permanent Settlement (1793): Introduced by Lord Cornwallis, this fixed land revenue demands permanently with zamindars (landlords). While it ensured steady income for the Company, it oppressed peasants who faced high taxes.
  • Judicial Reforms: The British established a hierarchy of courts, replacing traditional systems. The Supreme Court in Calcutta (1774) ensured British laws were prioritized, undermining local customs.
  • Police System: A structured police force was introduced to maintain law and order, often suppressing local uprisings to protect British interests.

These changes systematically weakened Indian rulers, centralized British authority, and laid the foundation for colonial rule in India.

Question 18:
Explain the role of the East India Company in transforming from a trading entity to a territorial power in India. Highlight key events and policies that facilitated this transition.
Answer:

The East India Company initially arrived in India as a trading entity under a charter from Queen Elizabeth I in 1600. However, over time, it transformed into a territorial power due to several key events and policies:

  • Battle of Plassey (1757): The Company, led by Robert Clive, defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal, marking its first major military success and gaining control over Bengal's revenue.
  • Diwani Rights (1765): The Mughal Emperor granted the Company the right to collect revenue (Diwani) in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa, strengthening its financial and administrative control.
  • Subsidiary Alliance (1798): Introduced by Lord Wellesley, this policy forced Indian rulers to accept British protection and station Company troops, gradually eroding their sovereignty.
  • Doctrine of Lapse (1848): Lord Dalhousie's policy allowed the Company to annex princely states if the ruler died without a natural heir, expanding its territories.

These events and policies systematically weakened Indian rulers, enabling the Company to transition from trade to territorial dominance.

Question 19:
Describe the administrative changes introduced by the British after the Battle of Buxar (1764). How did these changes consolidate British power in India?
Answer:

After the Battle of Buxar (1764), the British introduced significant administrative changes to consolidate their power in India:

  • Dual Government (1765-1772): The Company took control of revenue collection (Diwani) while leaving administration (Nizamat) to the Nawab of Bengal, creating a system of indirect rule that maximized profits.
  • Regulating Act of 1773: This established the Governor-General of Bengal (Warren Hastings as the first) and a Supreme Court in Calcutta, centralizing British authority.
  • Permanent Settlement (1793): Introduced by Lord Cornwallis, it fixed land revenue demands, creating a loyal class of zamindars who supported British rule.
  • Judicial Reforms: The British introduced a uniform legal system, replacing traditional Indian laws with English-style courts, ensuring control over justice.

These changes systematically replaced Indian administrative structures with British systems, ensuring political and economic dominance.

Case-based Questions (4 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 4-mark case-based questions assess analytical skills through real-life scenarios. Answers must be based on the case study provided.

Question 1:
How did the Battle of Plassey (1757) mark a turning point in British control over India? Analyze its impact using trade and territory.
Answer:
Case Context

The Battle of Plassey was fought between the British East India Company and Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • British gained control over Bengal’s trade after winning.
  • Mir Jafar’s betrayal helped them secure territory.
  • Our textbook shows it led to the Company’s dominance in India.
Current Relevance

It reminds us how colonial powers used alliances to expand control, similar to modern economic influence tactics.

Question 2:
Explain how the Doctrine of Lapse helped the British expand their territory. Give examples from NCERT.
Answer:
Case Context

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy by Lord Dalhousie to annex Indian states.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • States like Satara, Jhansi, and Nagpur were annexed.
  • Our textbook mentions Rani Lakshmibai’s resistance in Jhansi.
  • It allowed the British to control land without heirs.
Current Relevance

Similar policies today include corporate takeovers of smaller businesses, showing historical patterns of control.

Question 3:
Describe the role of trading posts like Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta in British territorial expansion.
Answer:
Case Context

British established trading posts in key coastal cities.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Madras (Chennai) became a center for cotton trade.
  • Bombay (Mumbai) was gifted by Portugal for trade.
  • Calcutta (Kolkata) helped control Bengal’s resources.
Current Relevance

These cities remain major economic hubs, showing how colonial trade shaped modern India.

Question 4:
How did the subsidiary alliance system weaken Indian rulers? Use examples from NCERT.
Answer:
Case Context

The subsidiary alliance was introduced by Lord Wellesley to control Indian states.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Hyderabad was the first to accept it.
  • Rulers lost armies and paid for British troops.
  • Our textbook shows Awadh’s annexation due to this policy.
Current Relevance

It reflects how powerful nations influence weaker ones today through military or economic dependence.

Question 5:
How did the East India Company use subsidiary alliances to expand its control in India? Provide examples from our textbook.
Answer:
Case Context

We studied how the East India Company used political strategies like subsidiary alliances to weaken Indian rulers.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • The Nizam of Hyderabad accepted a subsidiary alliance in 1798.
  • Awadh was forced into an alliance in 1801.
  • The Marathas lost independence after the Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817-19).
Current Relevance

Such tactics remind us of modern economic pressures by multinational companies.

Question 6:
Explain the Doctrine of Lapse with examples. How did it affect Indian rulers?
Answer:
Case Context

Our textbook shows Lord Dalhousie’s Doctrine of Lapse as a tool to annex Indian states.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Satara (1848) was annexed under this policy.
  • Jhansi (1854) was taken after Rani Lakshmibai’s husband died.
  • Nagpur (1854) lost independence similarly.
Current Relevance

This reminds us of unfair corporate takeovers today.

Question 7:
Describe the Battle of Plassey (1757) and its impact on British trade in India.
Answer:
Case Context

We learned how the Battle of Plassey marked the start of British political control.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Robert Clive defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah using Mir Jafar’s betrayal.
  • The Company gained control over Bengal’s revenue.
  • Trade expanded from textiles to territorial rule.
Current Relevance

Similar power shifts happen in modern business monopolies.

Question 8:
How did the Permanent Settlement (1793) affect farmers in Bengal? Compare it with modern land reforms.
Answer:
Case Context

Our textbook explains the Permanent Settlement fixed high revenue demands on Bengal farmers.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Zamindars became landlords, farmers suffered.
  • Many lost lands due to unpaid taxes.
  • Ryotwari system later improved conditions.
Current Relevance

Modern land reforms like MSP aim to protect farmers similarly.

Question 9:
How did the Battle of Plassey (1757) mark a turning point in British control over India? Analyze its impact using political and economic perspectives.
Answer:
Case Context

We studied that the Battle of Plassey was fought between the British East India Company and Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Political: British installed Mir Jafar as a puppet ruler, gaining indirect control.
  • Economic: Company secured trade rights and revenue from Bengal, boosting profits.
Current Relevance

Similar power shifts occur today when corporations influence governments for resources.

Question 10:
Explain how the Doctrine of Lapse helped the British expand their territory. Provide examples from NCERT to support your answer.
Answer:
Case Context

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy by Lord Dalhousie to annex states without natural heirs.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Example 1: Satara (1848) was annexed under this policy.
  • Example 2: Jhansi (1854) was taken over, leading to Rani Lakshmibai’s revolt.
Current Relevance

Modern laws still address inheritance disputes, like property rights.

Question 11:
Describe the role of Tipu Sultan in resisting British expansion. How did his strategies reflect geographical awareness?
Answer:
Case Context

Tipu Sultan, the ruler of Mysore, fiercely opposed the British in the late 18th century.

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • He used Mysore’s hilly terrain for guerrilla warfare.
  • Allied with French for advanced weapons, showing global connections.
Current Relevance

Modern armies still use terrain and alliances strategically.

Question 12:
Compare the subsidiary alliance and direct rule systems used by the British. Give one example of each from our textbook.
Answer:
Case Context

British employed both subsidiary alliance (indirect control) and direct rule (full annexation).

Historical/Geographical Analysis
  • Subsidiary Alliance: Awadh (1801) paid for British troops but kept nominal rule.
  • Direct Rule: Punjab (1849) was annexed after the Anglo-Sikh Wars.
Current Relevance

Similar control methods are seen in modern geopolitics, like puppet regimes.

Question 13:
Read the following case study and answer the question:

The British East India Company initially came to India as traders but gradually gained political control. They used various strategies like subsidiary alliances and the doctrine of lapse to expand their territory. The Battle of Plassey (1757) marked a turning point in their dominance.

Question: How did the subsidiary alliance system help the British expand their control in India? Provide two key points.

Answer:

The subsidiary alliance system was a clever strategy used by the British to expand their control in India. Here’s how it helped them:

  • Military Control: Indian rulers had to accept British troops in their territory and pay for their maintenance. This weakened the rulers' armies and made them dependent on the British for protection.
  • Political Influence: The British interfered in the internal matters of the Indian states under this system, gradually reducing the rulers' authority and increasing British dominance.

This system ensured that Indian rulers lost their independence while the British gained power without direct warfare.

Question 14:
Read the following case study and answer the question:

The British introduced new administrative systems like the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System to collect revenue. Farmers suffered under heavy taxes, leading to widespread poverty.

Question: Compare the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System in terms of their impact on Indian farmers.

Answer:

The Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System were two revenue systems introduced by the British, but they affected farmers differently:

  • Permanent Settlement: Landlords (zamindars) were made owners of the land and had to pay fixed revenue to the British. However, they exploited farmers by charging high rents, leading to extreme hardship.
  • Ryotwari System: Farmers (ryots) were directly taxed by the British. Though they owned the land, the high and unpredictable taxes often forced them into debt or to abandon their fields.

Both systems burdened farmers, but the Ryotwari System gave them land ownership while the Permanent Settlement made them victims of zamindars.

Question 15:
Read the following case study and answer the question:

The British East India Company initially came to India as traders but gradually expanded their control over large parts of the country. They used various strategies like subsidiary alliances and doctrine of lapse to annex Indian territories. The Battle of Plassey (1757) marked a turning point in their political dominance.

Question: How did the Battle of Plassey contribute to the British East India Company's territorial expansion in India? Provide two key reasons.

Answer:

The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a significant event that boosted the British East India Company's territorial control in India. Two key reasons for this are:

  • Political Manipulation: The British, led by Robert Clive, exploited the internal conflicts within the Nawab of Bengal's court. By forming alliances with Mir Jafar (a traitor in Siraj-ud-Daulah's army), they ensured victory without a major battle.
  • Economic Gains: After winning, the Company gained vast wealth from Bengal's treasury, which funded further military campaigns and territorial expansion. This victory also gave them the right to collect revenue (Diwani) in Bengal, strengthening their economic hold.

Thus, the Battle of Plassey laid the foundation for British colonial rule in India.

Question 16:
Analyze the given case and answer:

The British introduced policies like the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System to maximize revenue collection from Indian farmers. These systems often led to exploitation, pushing peasants into debt and poverty.

Question: Compare the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System in terms of their impact on Indian farmers. Highlight one similarity and one difference.

Answer:

The Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System were British revenue policies that heavily impacted Indian farmers:

  • Similarity: Both systems exploited farmers by imposing high revenue demands, leading to widespread poverty and indebtedness. Farmers often lost their lands if they failed to pay.
  • Difference: In the Permanent Settlement, revenue was fixed permanently with zamindars (landlords), who exploited peasants for profit. In the Ryotwari System, revenue was collected directly from ryots (cultivators), but fluctuating rates based on crop yields made it unpredictable.

These policies disrupted traditional agrarian systems and worsened rural distress during British rule.

Question 17:
Read the following case study: In the late 18th century, the British East India Company gradually expanded its control over Indian territories through a mix of diplomacy and military force. One such example was the Battle of Plassey in 1757, where the Company defeated Siraj-ud-Daulah, the Nawab of Bengal.

Based on this, explain how the Battle of Plassey became a turning point in the British conquest of India. Also, mention the role of Mir Jafar in this event.

Answer:

The Battle of Plassey (1757) was a decisive turning point in British conquest because it marked the beginning of their political dominance in India. Before this battle, the British were primarily traders, but their victory allowed them to control Bengal's wealth and resources.


Key reasons why it was significant:

  • The British gained diwani rights (revenue collection) over Bengal, making them financially powerful.
  • It exposed the weakness of Indian rulers due to internal betrayals, like Mir Jafar, who conspired with the British against Siraj-ud-Daulah.
  • It set a precedent for future annexations using subsidiary alliances and military force.

Mir Jafar, the commander of Siraj-ud-Daulah’s army, played a treacherous role by secretly siding with the British. In return, he was made the puppet Nawab of Bengal, but the real power remained with the British. This event showed how the British exploited divisions among Indian rulers to expand their control.

Question 18:
Analyze the given case: The British introduced the Doctrine of Lapse under Lord Dalhousie, which allowed them to annex Indian states if the ruler died without a natural heir. This policy was widely criticized as unfair.

How did this policy impact Indian rulers? Provide two examples of kingdoms annexed under this doctrine and explain why it angered Indians.

Answer:

The Doctrine of Lapse (1848-1856) was a controversial policy that allowed the British to annex Indian states if the ruler died without a male heir. This angered Indian rulers and people because it disregarded traditional succession practices.


Impact on Indian rulers:

  • Many lost their kingdoms unjustly, as the British refused to recognize adopted heirs.
  • It created fear and resentment among princely states, weakening their trust in British policies.

Examples of annexed kingdoms:

  • Satara (1848): Annexed despite having an adopted heir, sparking protests.
  • Jhansi (1854): Rani Lakshmibai’s adopted son was denied the throne, leading to the famous revolt in 1857.

This policy angered Indians because it was seen as a violation of their cultural and political rights. It also contributed to the growing discontent that eventually led to the Revolt of 1857.

Question 19:
Read the following case and answer the questions below:

The British East India Company initially came to India as traders but gradually gained political control. They used strategies like the Doctrine of Lapse and Subsidiary Alliance to expand their territory. The Battle of Plassey (1757) marked a turning point in their dominance.

Q1. How did the Doctrine of Lapse help the British expand their control in India? Provide an example.

Answer:

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy introduced by Lord Dalhousie to annex Indian states if the ruler died without a natural heir. This helped the British expand control by legally taking over territories without direct warfare.

For example, Satara (1848), Jhansi (1853), and Nagpur (1854) were annexed under this policy. The British claimed these states as their own, increasing their territorial dominance.

This strategy weakened Indian rulers and reduced resistance, making it easier for the British to consolidate power.

Question 20:
Read the following case and answer the questions below:

The British introduced new administrative systems like the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System to collect revenue efficiently. These systems often exploited Indian farmers, leading to widespread discontent.

Q2. Compare the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System in terms of their impact on Indian farmers.

Answer:

The Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System were two different revenue systems introduced by the British:

  • Permanent Settlement (Zamindari System):
    Fixed revenue demand on zamindars (landlords), who exploited peasants to meet high taxes.
    Farmers suffered as zamindars increased rents, leading to debt and land loss.
  • Ryotwari System:
    Revenue was collected directly from farmers (ryots).
    Though initially fair, high tax rates and frequent reassessments left farmers impoverished.

Both systems exploited farmers, but the Ryotwari System slightly reduced middlemen exploitation, while the Permanent Settlement created oppressive zamindars.

Question 21:
Read the following case and answer the questions below:

The British East India Company initially came to India as traders but gradually expanded their control over large parts of the country. They used various strategies like subsidiary alliances and the doctrine of lapse to annex Indian territories.

Q1. How did the subsidiary alliance system help the British in expanding their territorial control in India?
Answer:

The subsidiary alliance was a strategy used by the British to expand their control without direct warfare. Under this system:

  • Indian rulers had to accept British protection and keep British troops in their kingdom.
  • The ruler had to pay for the maintenance of these troops, which often drained their treasury.
  • They could not employ any European without British approval, reducing their independence.
  • If a ruler failed to pay, parts of their territory were taken away as penalty.

This weakened Indian rulers economically and politically, making them dependent on the British and paving the way for annexation.

Question 22:
Read the following case and answer the questions below:

After the Battle of Plassey (1757), the British gained significant control over Bengal. They introduced new revenue systems like the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System, which affected Indian farmers deeply.

Q2. Compare the Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System in terms of their impact on Indian peasants.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System were two different land revenue policies introduced by the British:

  • Permanent Settlement (Zamindari System):
    Fixed revenue demand permanently with zamindars (landlords).
    Peasants suffered as zamindars exploited them to meet high revenue demands.
    Many lost their lands due to inability to pay.
  • Ryotwari System:
    Revenue was collected directly from ryots (peasants).
    Though it removed intermediaries, the high tax burden still made peasants poor.
    Peasants often fell into debt due to fluctuating revenue demands.

Both systems exploited farmers, leading to widespread poverty and agrarian distress.

Chat on WhatsApp