Online Self Test
Learn & Practice Quizzes & Challenges Competitive Exams
 

History - Ruling the Countryside – CBSE NCERT Study Resources

Previous ChapterNext Chapter
Previous Chapter Next Chapter
History - Ruling the Countryside

Study Materials

8th

8th - Social Studies

History - Ruling the Countryside

Jump to Question Sets

Overview of the Chapter

This chapter explores how the British East India Company established control over rural India and transformed agricultural practices to serve their economic interests. It discusses the various systems of revenue collection, the impact on peasants, and the resulting changes in the countryside.

Key Concepts

Permanent Settlement

Introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793, this system fixed land revenue demands permanently with zamindars, who acted as intermediaries between the British and peasants. The zamindars were expected to pay a fixed amount to the Company, regardless of the harvest.

Ryotwari System

Implemented in parts of Madras and Bombay Presidencies, this system recognized peasants (ryots) as landowners. They paid revenue directly to the Company, which was periodically revised based on land assessments.

Mahalwari System

Introduced in the North-Western Provinces, Punjab, and parts of Central India, this system involved village communities (mahals) collectively responsible for revenue payment. The revenue was revised periodically.

Impact of British Policies

  • Peasants faced high revenue demands, leading to indebtedness and land alienation.
  • Commercial crops like indigo and opium were promoted, disrupting food crop cultivation.
  • Traditional village economies were destabilized due to forced commercialization.

Peasant Resistance

Farmers resisted exploitative policies through rebellions like the Indigo Revolt (1859-60) in Bengal, where they refused to grow indigo under oppressive conditions. This movement forced the British to introduce reforms.

Conclusion

The British revenue systems and agricultural policies reshaped rural India, often causing hardship for peasants while benefiting colonial interests. These changes laid the foundation for later agrarian struggles during the freedom movement.

All Question Types with Solutions – CBSE Exam Pattern

Explore a complete set of CBSE-style questions with detailed solutions, categorized by marks and question types. Ideal for exam preparation, revision and practice.

Very Short Answer (1 Mark) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These are 1-mark questions requiring direct, concise answers. Ideal for quick recall and concept clarity.

Question 1:
What was the main aim of the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British?
Answer:

To fix land revenue permanently.

Question 2:
Who introduced the Ryotwari System in Madras and Bombay?
Answer:

Thomas Munro.

Question 3:
Name the governor-general who introduced the Mahalwari System.
Answer:

Lord William Bentinck.

Question 4:
What was the main crop grown under the indigo cultivation system?
Answer:

Indigo for dye production.

Question 5:
Why did the indigo farmers revolt in 1859?
Answer:

Against forced indigo cultivation.

Question 6:
Which region was known as the opium belt of India?
Answer:

Bihar and Bengal.

Question 7:
What was the Champaran Movement related to?
Answer:

Indigo farmers' protest.

Question 8:
Who led the Champaran Satyagraha?
Answer:

Mahatma Gandhi.

Question 9:
What was the Blue Rebellion?
Answer:

Indigo farmers' uprising in Bengal.

Question 10:
Which system replaced the Permanent Settlement in some areas?
Answer:

Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems.

Question 11:
What was the Sunset Law in the Permanent Settlement?
Answer:

Revenue payment by sunset.

Question 12:
Name one disadvantage of the Permanent Settlement for farmers.
Answer:

High fixed revenue demands.

Question 13:
What was the Zamindar's role in the Permanent Settlement?
Answer:

Collect revenue for the British.

Question 14:
Why did the British promote cash crops in India?
Answer:

For export and profit.

Question 15:
What was the main objective of the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal?
Answer:

The main objective of the Permanent Settlement was to ensure a fixed revenue for the British from landowners (zamindars). It aimed to create a loyal class of landlords who would collect revenue efficiently.

Question 16:
Name the governor-general who introduced the Ryotwari System in South India.
Answer:

Thomas Munro introduced the Ryotwari System in South India. This system allowed peasants (ryots) to pay revenue directly to the British.

Question 17:
What was the impact of the Mahalwari System on Indian farmers?
Answer:

The Mahalwari System increased the burden on farmers as revenue was fixed too high. Many lost their land due to inability to pay, leading to widespread poverty.

Question 18:
Why did the British promote the cultivation of indigo in India?
Answer:

The British promoted indigo cultivation because it was in high demand in Europe for dyeing textiles. Indian farmers were forced to grow it under the Nij and Ryoti systems.

Question 19:
How did the Permanent Settlement affect zamindars?
Answer:

Many zamindars lost their lands as they failed to pay the fixed revenue. Others exploited peasants to meet British demands, worsening rural conditions.

Question 20:
What was the role of the Champaran Movement in Indian history?
Answer:

The Champaran Movement (1917), led by Gandhi, protested against forced indigo farming. It marked the beginning of peasant resistance and Gandhi's active role in India's freedom struggle.

Question 21:
Why did the British introduce the Ryotwari System after the Permanent Settlement?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was introduced to eliminate zamindars and collect revenue directly from farmers. The British believed it would increase efficiency and reduce exploitation.

Question 22:
Name one major drawback of the Mahalwari System.
Answer:

A major drawback was the high revenue demand, which often exceeded the farmers' income, forcing them into debt or landlessness.

Question 23:
What was the Nij cultivation system in indigo farming?
Answer:

In Nij cultivation, planters directly controlled large farms and employed laborers. This system often displaced local farmers and caused conflicts.

Question 24:
How did the Ryoti system exploit Indian farmers?
Answer:

Under the Ryoti system, farmers were forced to grow indigo on part of their land and accept unfair loans, trapping them in cycles of debt.

Question 25:
What was the significance of the Indigo Commission (1860)?
Answer:

The Indigo Commission was set up to investigate farmer grievances. Its report exposed exploitation, leading to the decline of forced indigo cultivation in Bengal.

Very Short Answer (2 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 2-mark questions test key concepts in a brief format. Answers are expected to be accurate and slightly descriptive.

Question 1:
Why did the ryots in Deccan revolt against the moneylenders in the 19th century?
Answer:

The ryots revolted because moneylenders charged high interest rates and manipulated records to seize their lands. The British land revenue policies forced peasants into debt, leading to widespread anger and the Deccan Riots of 1875.

Question 2:
How did the Mahalwari System differ from the Permanent Settlement?
Answer:

  • The Mahalwari System involved village communities (mahals) collectively paying revenue, while the Permanent Settlement fixed revenue with zamindars.
  • Revenue was revised periodically in Mahalwari, but permanent in the other system.

Question 3:
What was the impact of the indigo cultivation on Indian farmers?
Answer:

Farmers were forced to grow indigo instead of food crops due to oppressive contracts (dadani). Low prices and harsh conditions led to the Blue Rebellion (1859), where farmers revolted against planters.

Question 4:
Why did the British promote commercial crops like cotton and jute in India?
Answer:

The British needed raw materials for their industries in England. Crops like cotton and jute were in high demand for textile factories, leading to forced cultivation and export from India.

Question 5:
Explain the term sunset law in the context of the Permanent Settlement.
Answer:

The sunset law stated that if zamindars failed to pay revenue by sunset on a fixed day, their lands would be auctioned. This ensured strict compliance but often led to exploitation of peasants.

Question 6:
What role did the Champaran Movement play in India's freedom struggle?
Answer:

Led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1917, it protested against forced indigo cultivation. It marked Gandhi's first satyagraha in India, inspiring future movements against British oppression.

Question 7:
How did the land revenue policies of the British affect Indian agriculture?
Answer:

  • Farmers shifted from food crops to cash crops, causing famines.
  • High revenue demands led to debt and landlessness.
  • Traditional farming systems were destroyed.

Question 8:
Who were the planters in the context of indigo cultivation?
Answer:

Planters were European (mostly British) entrepreneurs who forced Indian farmers to grow indigo under unfair contracts. They controlled trade and exploited farmers for profit.

Question 9:
What was the significance of the Blue Rebellion?
Answer:

It was the first major protest by Indian farmers against exploitative indigo cultivation. The rebellion forced the British to pass laws protecting farmers, showing the power of collective resistance.

Question 10:
Why did the Ryotwari System fail in many regions?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System failed because:

  • Peasants (ryots) were overburdened with high revenue demands.
  • They often lacked resources to pay, leading to debt and land loss.
  • Officials frequently increased taxes, making it unsustainable.

Question 11:
Name one negative impact of the British land revenue policies on Indian farmers.
Answer:

Farmers faced heavy taxation, leading to widespread poverty and indebtedness. Many lost their lands due to inability to pay revenue.

Question 12:
What role did the Champaran Movement play in challenging British agrarian policies?
Answer:

The Champaran Movement, led by Gandhi, protested against forced indigo cultivation. It exposed British exploitation and marked the beginning of peasant resistance.

Question 13:
Why was indigo cultivation unpopular among farmers in Bengal?
Answer:

Indigo cultivation was unpopular because:

  • Farmers were forced to grow it instead of food crops.
  • They received low prices and faced harsh treatment from British planters.

Question 14:
What was the significance of the Blue Rebellion in 1859?
Answer:

The Blue Rebellion was a peasant uprising against indigo planters. It highlighted farmer grievances and forced the British to introduce reforms.

Question 15:
How did the British use the Doctrine of Lapse to expand control over Indian lands?
Answer:

The Doctrine of Lapse allowed the British to annex Indian states if rulers died without a male heir. This increased their territorial control and revenue.

Question 16:
Explain one way in which the subsidiary alliance affected Indian rulers.
Answer:

Indian rulers under the subsidiary alliance lost their independence. They had to pay for British troops and accept British interference in governance.

Question 17:
What was the impact of British land revenue systems on traditional Indian agriculture?
Answer:

Traditional agriculture declined as farmers shifted to cash crops for revenue. Soil fertility decreased, and food shortages became common.

Question 18:
Name one social consequence of the British agrarian policies in India.
Answer:

Peasants were reduced to landless laborers due to debt and land alienation, worsening rural poverty.

Question 19:
Why did the Ryotwari System focus on individual cultivators?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System focused on individual cultivators (ryots) because the British believed it would eliminate intermediaries like zamindars, ensuring direct revenue collection. This system assessed taxes based on soil quality and crop potential, making it more flexible than the Permanent Settlement.

Question 20:
How did the British use indigo cultivation to their advantage?
Answer:

The British forced Indian farmers to grow indigo under the ryoti system, as it was a profitable cash crop for dyeing textiles in Europe. Farmers were given loans but trapped in cycles of debt due to low prices and high demands.

Question 21:
Define the term commercialization of agriculture under British rule.
Answer:

Commercialization of agriculture refers to the shift from subsistence farming to cash crops (like cotton, indigo) for British industries. This reduced food production, causing famines, while profits benefited colonial trade.

Question 22:
Why did the Deccan Riots occur in 1875?
Answer:

The Deccan Riots erupted due to peasant anger against moneylenders who exploited high revenue demands. Farmers protested unfair land confiscations and debt bondage, forcing the British to pass the Deccan Agriculturists' Relief Act.

Question 23:
How did the Blue Rebellion impact indigo production in Bengal?
Answer:

The Blue Rebellion (1859) saw Bengali ryots refusing to grow indigo, backed by zamindars and missionaries. It exposed British coercion, leading to the decline of indigo farming as synthetic dyes replaced it.

Question 24:
What was the significance of the Sunset Law in the Permanent Settlement?
Answer:

The Sunset Law mandated zamindars to pay revenue by sunset on a fixed date, else their lands were auctioned. This ensured British income but ruined many traditional landlords unable to meet demands.

Question 25:
List two differences between the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems.
Answer:
  • Ryotwari: Tax was collected directly from individual farmers (ryots), prevalent in Madras and Bombay.
  • Mahalwari: Tax was collected from village communities (mahals), mainly in North India.
Question 26:
How did the British land revenue policies affect Indian farmers?
Answer:

British policies like Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari led to high taxes, debt, and famines. Farmers shifted from food crops to cash crops, worsening poverty and triggering revolts like the Deccan Riots.

Short Answer (3 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 3-mark questions require brief explanations and help assess understanding and application of concepts.

Question 1:
What was the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal?
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement was a land revenue system introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were made the permanent owners of land, provided they paid a fixed amount of revenue to the British.

The revenue was fixed and not revised, which initially benefited the zamindars but later led to exploitation of peasants. This system aimed to ensure a steady income for the British and create a loyal class of landlords.

Question 2:
How did the Ryotwari System differ from the Mahalwari System?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System and Mahalwari System were two different land revenue systems introduced by the British.

Ryotwari System: Implemented in South India, it recognized peasants (ryots) as landowners who paid revenue directly to the British.

Mahalwari System: Applied in North India, it involved village communities (mahals) collectively paying revenue. The village headman collected and submitted the tax.

The key difference was in land ownership and revenue collection—individual peasants in Ryotwari vs. village communities in Mahalwari.

Question 3:
Why did the British promote the cultivation of indigo in India?
Answer:

The British promoted indigo cultivation because it was in high demand in Europe for dyeing textiles.

India's tropical climate was ideal for growing indigo, and the British forced farmers to grow it under the Nij and Ryoti systems.

Farmers suffered as they were paid very low prices and could not grow food crops, leading to the Blue Rebellion in 1859.

Question 4:
Explain the impact of the Permanent Settlement on Indian peasants.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement had severe effects on Indian peasants:

  • Peasants were exploited by zamindars, who charged high rents to meet British revenue demands.
  • Many lost their lands due to inability to pay, leading to widespread poverty.
  • Agriculture stagnated as neither peasants nor zamindars invested in land improvement.

This system created long-term agrarian distress in Bengal.

Question 5:
What was the Nij cultivation system in indigo production?
Answer:

The Nij cultivation was a method where British planters directly cultivated indigo on large farms they owned or leased.

They employed landless laborers to grow indigo, but this system was expensive due to high land and labor costs.

Over time, planters shifted to the Ryoti system, forcing local farmers to grow indigo under unfair contracts.

Question 6:
Describe the role of Champaran in the indigo rebellion.
Answer:

Champaran (Bihar) became a major center of the indigo rebellion in 1917 when farmers protested against forced indigo cultivation.

Led by Mahatma Gandhi, the movement exposed the exploitation by British planters.

The Champaran Satyagraha marked Gandhi's first successful mass protest in India, leading to the abolition of the oppressive Tinkathia system.

Question 7:
Explain the impact of the indigo cultivation on Indian farmers during British rule.
Answer:

Indigo cultivation forced farmers into the cycle of debt due to high demands and low prices set by British planters.
Farmers were compelled to grow indigo instead of food crops, leading to famine and unrest.
This exploitation later led to the Blue Rebellion (1859), where farmers revolted against the oppressive system.

Question 8:
Why did the British introduce the Mahalwari System?
Answer:

The British introduced the Mahalwari System to simplify revenue collection in northwestern India.
It aimed to involve village communities (mahals) in revenue payment, ensuring stability.
The system also tried to balance the interests of farmers and the British by revising revenue periodically.

Question 9:
Describe the role of zamindars under the Permanent Settlement.
Answer:

Zamindars acted as intermediaries between the British and peasants.
They collected rent from farmers and paid a fixed revenue to the British.
Over time, many zamindars became oppressive, exploiting peasants to maximize their profits.

Question 10:
What were the consequences of the Blue Rebellion?
Answer:

The Blue Rebellion led to the decline of forced indigo cultivation as farmers protested against British planters.
It exposed the exploitative nature of British policies, forcing the government to introduce reforms.
The rebellion also inspired later movements against colonial oppression.

Long Answer (5 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 5-mark questions are descriptive and require detailed, structured answers with proper explanation and examples.

Question 1:
Explain how the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British affected the zamindars and peasants in rural Bengal.
Answer:
Historical Context

The Permanent Settlement was introduced in 1793 by Lord Cornwallis to fix land revenue demands.

Key Developments
  • Zamindars became landowners but had to pay fixed revenue.
  • Peasants suffered as zamindars increased rents to meet British demands.
  • Many zamindars lost lands due to inability to pay.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows peasants faced exploitation, leading to poverty and famines.

Current Relevance

Land reforms in independent India addressed such inequalities.

Question 2:
Describe the Ryotwari System and its impact on farmers in Madras Presidency.
Answer:
Historical Context

The Ryotwari System was introduced in Madras Presidency where farmers (ryots) paid revenue directly to the British.

Key Developments
  • Farmers were recognized as landowners but taxed heavily.
  • High revenue led to debt and land loss.
  • Unlike Permanent Settlement, there were no zamindars.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook mentions famines like the Great Famine of 1876-78 due to exploitation.

Current Relevance

Modern land laws protect farmers from such unfair systems.

Question 3:
How did the Indigo Rebellion reflect the resistance of peasants against British policies?
Answer:
Historical Context

The Indigo Rebellion (1859-60) was a revolt by Bengali peasants against forced indigo cultivation.

Key Developments
  • Peasants refused to grow indigo due to low profits and oppression.
  • British planters used violence, but peasants united.
  • It inspired later movements like the Champaran Satyagraha.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows it weakened British control over agriculture.

Current Relevance

Farmers' protests today echo similar demands for fair treatment.

Question 4:
Analyze the role of Mahalwari System in the North-Western Provinces and its consequences.
Answer:
Historical Context

The Mahalwari System was implemented in North-Western Provinces, where villages (mahals) collectively paid revenue.

Key Developments
  • Revenue was revised periodically, causing uncertainty.
  • Peasants and landlords shared tax burden.
  • Over-taxation led to rural indebtedness.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook highlights how it disrupted traditional village economies.

Current Relevance

Today, cooperative farming models address similar challenges.

Question 5:
Compare the effects of Permanent Settlement and Ryotwari System on Indian agriculture.
Answer:
Historical Context

Both systems were British revenue policies but differed in implementation.

Key Developments
  • Permanent Settlement benefited zamindars but exploited peasants.
  • Ryotwari System taxed farmers directly, leading to widespread distress.
  • Both caused agrarian crises like the Bengal Famine of 1770.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows these systems ruined traditional farming practices.

Current Relevance

Modern policies focus on farmer welfare and sustainable agriculture.

Question 6:
Explain how the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British affected zamindars and peasants in rural Bengal.
Answer:
Historical Context

The Permanent Settlement was introduced in 1793 by Lord Cornwallis to fix land revenue demands on zamindars.

Key Developments
  • Zamindars became landowners but faced high revenue demands.
  • Peasants suffered as zamindars increased rents to meet British demands.
  • Many zamindars lost lands due to inability to pay.
Socio-economic Impact

This led to rural indebtedness and exploitation of peasants, as seen in our textbook.

Current Relevance

Land reforms in independent India addressed such inequalities.

Question 7:
How did the Indigo Rebellion reflect the exploitation of peasants under British rule?
Answer:
Historical Context

The Indigo Rebellion (1859-60) was a revolt by Bengali peasants against forced indigo cultivation.

Key Developments
  • Peasants were forced to grow indigo instead of food crops.
  • They faced low prices and brutal oppression by planters.
  • The rebellion spread across Bengal, supported by intellectuals.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook highlights how this exposed colonial exploitation.

Current Relevance

Farmers' movements today still fight against unfair practices.

Question 8:
Analyze the role of Mahalwari System in changing land revenue collection in North India.
Answer:
Historical Context

The Mahalwari System was introduced in North India to collect revenue from village communities (mahals).

Key Developments
  • Revenue was fixed on entire villages, not individuals.
  • Village heads (lambardars) collected taxes.
  • Over-assessment led to peasant hardships.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook explains how this disrupted traditional farming.

Current Relevance

Panchayati Raj now involves local governance in revenue matters.

Question 9:
How did the indigo cultivation under the British lead to the Blue Rebellion?
Answer:
Historical Context

British forced farmers in Bengal to grow indigo for European markets under oppressive contracts.

Key Developments
  • Farmers faced low prices and high penalties.
  • In 1859, farmers refused to grow indigo, leading to the Blue Rebellion.
  • Our textbook shows protests spread across Bengal.
Socio-economic Impact

The rebellion exposed British exploitation.

Current Relevance

Similar movements inspire farmer protests today.

Question 10:
Analyze the role of Mahalwari System in changing land revenue practices in North India.
Answer:
Historical Context

The Mahalwari System was introduced in North India, where village heads collected revenue.

Key Developments
  • Revenue was fixed on entire villages (mahals).
  • Over-assessment led to farmer distress.
  • Many villages were abandoned due to high taxes.
Socio-economic Impact

We studied how this system increased rural poverty.

Current Relevance

Land reforms post-independence addressed these issues.

Question 11:
Discuss the consequences of British land revenue policies on tribal communities in India.
Answer:
Historical Context

British policies disrupted traditional tribal land rights.

Key Developments
  • Forest laws restricted tribal access to resources.
  • Forced labor and high taxes impoverished tribes.
  • Rebellions like Santhal Hul (1855) occurred.
Socio-economic Impact

Our textbook shows how tribes lost self-sufficiency.

Current Relevance

Modern laws protect tribal land rights.

Question 12:
Explain the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal. Discuss its impact on the zamindars and peasants.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement was a land revenue system introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were recognized as the permanent owners of the land, provided they paid a fixed amount of revenue to the British government. The revenue was fixed and not subject to change, regardless of the harvest's success or failure.

Impact on Zamindars:
1. Many zamindars benefited initially as they could collect rent from peasants and keep any surplus after paying the fixed revenue.
2. However, if they failed to pay the revenue, their lands were auctioned, leading to the decline of many traditional zamindari families.

Impact on Peasants:
1. Peasants suffered as zamindars increased rents to maximize profits, leaving them in poverty.
2. Since the revenue was fixed, peasants had no relief during poor harvests, leading to widespread indebtedness and loss of land.

The system ultimately favored the British by ensuring a steady income, but it exploited both zamindars and peasants, disrupting the agrarian economy.

Question 13:
Describe the Ryotwari System implemented by the British in South India. How did it differ from the Mahalwari System?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was introduced by Thomas Munro in South India, where revenue was collected directly from the peasants (ryots). The British government assessed the land's productivity and fixed the revenue, which the peasants had to pay. Unlike the Permanent Settlement, the revenue could be revised periodically.

Key Features:
1. Peasants were considered the owners of the land but were heavily taxed.
2. The system led to high revenue demands, forcing many peasants into debt or to abandon their lands.

Difference from Mahalwari System:
1. In the Mahalwari System, revenue was collected from entire villages (mahals) through village heads or landlords.
2. The revenue was shared among all cultivators in the village, unlike the individual responsibility in the Ryotwari System.
3. The Mahalwari System was implemented in parts of North India, while the Ryotwari System was specific to South India.

Both systems exploited farmers but differed in their administrative approach and regional implementation.

Question 14:
Explain the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal. Discuss its impact on the zamindars and peasants.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement was a land revenue system introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were recognized as the permanent owners of the land, provided they paid a fixed amount of revenue to the British government. The revenue was fixed and not subject to change, regardless of the agricultural output.

Impact on Zamindars:

  • Zamindars benefited initially as they could collect rent from peasants and keep any surplus after paying the fixed revenue.
  • However, many zamindars failed to pay the fixed revenue on time, leading to the auction of their lands.

Impact on Peasants:

  • Peasants suffered as zamindars increased rents to maximize their profits.
  • Many peasants were evicted from their lands if they failed to pay high rents, leading to widespread poverty.

Overall, the Permanent Settlement created a class of wealthy zamindars but worsened the condition of peasants, leading to agrarian distress.

Question 15:
Describe the Ryotwari System implemented by the British in South India. How did it differ from the Mahalwari System?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was a land revenue system introduced by the British in South India, where the revenue was collected directly from the ryots (peasants). The British government assessed the land and fixed the revenue based on soil quality and crop potential. The ryots were considered the owners of the land as long as they paid the revenue.

Key Features:

  • Revenue was fixed for a period of 20-30 years, after which it could be revised.
  • Peasants had the right to sell or mortgage their land.

Difference from the Mahalwari System:

  • In the Mahalwari System, revenue was collected from the village (mahal) as a whole, with the village headman responsible for payment.
  • The Ryotwari System focused on individual cultivators, while the Mahalwari System involved collective responsibility.

Both systems aimed to maximize revenue but often burdened farmers with high taxes, leading to economic hardship.

Question 16:
Explain the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal. Discuss its impact on the peasants and the zamindars.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement was a land revenue system introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 in Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha. Under this system, the zamindars were recognized as the permanent owners of the land, provided they paid a fixed amount of revenue to the British government annually. The revenue amount was fixed and not subject to change, regardless of the agricultural output.

Impact on Peasants:

  • Peasants were exploited by zamindars, who demanded high rents to meet the fixed revenue.
  • Many peasants lost their lands due to inability to pay rents, leading to widespread poverty.
  • There was no incentive for zamindars to improve agricultural conditions, as revenue was fixed.

Impact on Zamindars:

  • Some zamindars benefited initially, as they could retain surplus revenue.
  • However, many failed to pay the fixed amount and lost their lands due to auctions by the British.
  • The system created a class of absentee landlords who cared little for peasant welfare.

Overall, the Permanent Settlement led to agrarian distress and stagnation in rural economies, benefiting only a few while exploiting the majority.

Question 17:
Describe the Ryotwari System implemented by the British in South India. How was it different from the Mahalwari System?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was introduced by Thomas Munro in South India (Madras, Bombay, and parts of Assam). Under this system, the British government directly collected revenue from the peasants (ryots), who were considered the owners of the land. The revenue was revised periodically based on soil quality and crop yield.

Key Features:

  • Peasants had ownership rights but were heavily taxed.
  • Revenue rates were high, often leaving peasants in debt.
  • The system discouraged long-term agricultural improvements due to frequent revenue revisions.

Difference from Mahalwari System:

  • The Mahalwari System, introduced in North-Western Provinces, involved revenue collection from entire villages (mahals) through village headmen.
  • In Ryotwari, individual peasants paid revenue, while in Mahalwari, the responsibility was collective.
  • Mahalwari allowed periodic revenue adjustments, but Ryotwari was more exploitative due to direct peasant taxation.

Both systems exploited farmers, but the Ryotwari System placed a heavier burden on individual peasants, leading to widespread agrarian distress.

Question 18:
Explain the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal and its impact on the agricultural economy of the region.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement was a land revenue system introduced by the British in Bengal in 1793 under Lord Cornwallis. It fixed the land revenue demand permanently, meaning the amount to be paid by zamindars (landlords) to the British would not change in the future.

Key features:

  • Zamindars were recognized as owners of the land.
  • They had to pay a fixed amount of revenue to the British every year.
  • If they failed to pay, their lands could be auctioned.

Impact on the agricultural economy:

  • Exploitation of peasants: Zamindars increased rents to maximize profits, leading to peasant hardships.
  • Stagnation in agriculture: Since revenue was fixed, zamindars had no incentive to improve land or farming techniques.
  • Decline of traditional systems: The system disrupted traditional village economies and led to rural indebtedness.

Overall, the Permanent Settlement benefited the British and zamindars but worsened the condition of farmers, leading to long-term economic decline in Bengal.

Question 19:
Describe the Ryotwari System implemented by the British in South India and compare its effects with the Mahalwari System.
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was a land revenue system introduced by the British in South India, where revenue was collected directly from the ryots (cultivators).

Key features:

  • Individual cultivators were recognized as owners of the land.
  • Revenue was assessed based on soil quality and crop potential.
  • Payments were revised periodically, unlike the Permanent Settlement.

Comparison with the Mahalwari System:

  • Revenue collection: In Ryotwari, revenue was collected from individual farmers, while in Mahalwari, it was collected from village communities or mahals.
  • Ownership: Ryotwari gave ownership to cultivators, whereas Mahalwari recognized joint ownership by village heads.
  • Flexibility: Mahalwari allowed periodic reassessment, similar to Ryotwari, but both were less rigid than the Permanent Settlement.

Both systems aimed to maximize revenue but often led to peasant distress due to high taxation and unpredictable assessments.

Question 20:
Explain the Permanent Settlement introduced by the British in Bengal. Discuss its impact on the zamindars and peasants.
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement was a land revenue system introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 in Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha. Under this system, zamindars were recognized as the permanent owners of the land, provided they paid a fixed amount of revenue to the British government annually. The revenue was fixed and not subject to change, regardless of the agricultural output.

Impact on Zamindars:

  • Zamindars benefited initially as they could collect rent from peasants and keep any surplus after paying the fixed revenue.
  • However, many zamindars failed to pay the fixed revenue on time, leading to the auction of their lands.
  • Over time, zamindars became mere rent collectors, losing their traditional role in rural society.

Impact on Peasants:

  • Peasants suffered as zamindars increased rents to maximize their profits.
  • They had no rights over the land and could be evicted if they failed to pay rent.
  • The system led to widespread poverty and indebtedness among peasants.

Overall, the Permanent Settlement favored the British by ensuring a steady revenue flow but exploited both zamindars and peasants in the long run.

Question 21:
Describe the Ryotwari System implemented by the British in South India. How did it differ from the Mahalwari System?
Answer:

The Ryotwari System was a land revenue system introduced by the British in South India, particularly in Madras and Bombay Presidencies. Under this system, the British government directly collected revenue from the ryots (peasants) who were considered the owners of the land. The revenue was not fixed and was revised periodically based on the land's productivity.

Key Features of Ryotwari System:

  • Peasants were recognized as landowners but had to pay revenue directly to the government.
  • The revenue rates were high and often led to peasant indebtedness.
  • Surveys were conducted to assess land quality and fix revenue accordingly.

Differences from Mahalwari System:

  • In the Mahalwari System, revenue was collected from the village (mahal) as a whole, whereas in the Ryotwari System, it was collected from individual peasants.
  • The Mahalwari System was implemented in North-Western provinces, while the Ryotwari System was used in South India.
  • The Mahalwari System involved village headmen in revenue collection, whereas the Ryotwari System bypassed intermediaries.

Both systems exploited peasants but the Ryotwari System placed a heavier burden on individual farmers due to fluctuating revenue demands.

Case-based Questions (4 Marks) – with Solutions (CBSE Pattern)

These 4-mark case-based questions assess analytical skills through real-life scenarios. Answers must be based on the case study provided.

Question 1:
After the Battle of Plassey, the British introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal. Case Context: Zamindars were made landowners.

How did this system affect farmers and why did it fail?
Answer:
Case Context: The Permanent Settlement fixed revenue demands on zamindars.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Farmers suffered as zamindars increased rents.
  • Many zamindars failed to pay, leading to land auctions.
  • Our textbook shows this system collapsed due to rigid revenue demands.
Current Relevance: Similar land revenue issues persist in some states today.
Question 2:
The Ryotwari System was implemented in Madras and Bombay. Case Context: Farmers paid taxes directly to the British.

Compare its impact with the Mahalwari System.
Answer:
Case Context: Ryotwari taxed individual farmers, while Mahalwari taxed village communities.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Ryotwari caused debt as assessments were high.
  • Mahalwari allowed collective responsibility, reducing exploitation.
  • Our textbook mentions both systems led to peasant revolts.
Current Relevance: Modern tax systems still balance individual and collective responsibility.
Question 3:
Case Context: Indigo cultivation forced farmers into nij and ryoti systems.

Why did the Blue Rebellion occur and how did it inspire Gandhi later?
Answer:
Case Context: Farmers were forced to grow indigo under exploitative contracts.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Ryoti system trapped farmers in debt.
  • The 1859 rebellion saw mass refusal to grow indigo.
  • Gandhi later used similar protests in Champaran.
Current Relevance: Farmer protests today echo these collective actions.
Question 4:
Case Context: The British promoted commercial crops like cotton and jute.

Analyze how this shifted India’s agricultural economy and led to famines.
Answer:
Case Context: Food crops were replaced with cash crops for export.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Cotton for British mills reduced food production.
  • Our textbook cites the 1943 Bengal Famine as a result.
  • Farmers lost self-sufficiency.
Current Relevance: Debates on cash crops vs. food security continue today.
Question 5:
After the Battle of Plassey, the British introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal. Case Context: Zamindars were made landowners.

Q: How did this system affect farmers and why did it fail?
Answer:
Case Context: The Permanent Settlement fixed revenue demands on zamindars.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Farmers suffered as zamindars increased rents.
  • Poor harvests led to zamindar bankruptcies.
  • Our textbook shows Ryotwari system was better for farmers.
Current Relevance: Land reforms in India still address unequal ownership.
Question 6:
Case Context: Indigo cultivation expanded under British rule. Farmers were forced via dadani loans.

Q: Why did the Blue Rebellion occur and what were its outcomes?
Answer:
Case Context: Farmers revolted against unfair indigo contracts.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Low prices and high debt angered farmers.
  • Gandhiji supported Champaran movement later.
  • Our textbook mentions the 1859 rebellion ended forced cultivation.
Current Relevance: Modern farmer protests echo similar demands.
Question 7:
Case Context: The British promoted cash crops like cotton over food grains.

Q: How did this impact Indian agriculture and society?
Answer:
Case Context: Focus on cash crops reduced food security.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Famines like 1770 Bengal famine occurred.
  • Farmers lost traditional crop knowledge.
  • Our textbook shows Deccan riots against moneylenders.
Current Relevance: MSP debates today address crop choices.
Question 8:
Case Context: The Mahalwari System was implemented in North India.

Q: Compare its features with the Ryotwari System and which benefited farmers more?
Answer:
Case Context: Mahalwari taxed villages collectively; Ryotwari taxed individuals.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Ryotwari gave ownership rights to farmers.
  • Mahalwari led to corruption by headmen.
  • Our textbook cites Madras Ryotwari success.
Current Relevance: Land records digitization prevents similar issues.
Question 9:
The Indigo Rebellion (1859-60) was a major protest by farmers. Case Context: British forced cultivation of indigo.

Explain why farmers revolted and its impact.
Answer:
Case Context: Farmers were forced to grow indigo instead of food crops.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Low prices and exploitative contracts angered farmers.
  • Our textbook mentions leaders like Digambar Biswas.
  • British eventually stopped forced cultivation.
Current Relevance: Similar protests occur today against unfair farming policies. Examples: 2020 Farm Laws protests, colonial tea plantations, and cotton farmers' struggles.
Question 10:
The Mahalwari System was introduced in North India. Case Context: Villages collectively paid revenue.

Compare it with the Ryotwari System and its effects.
Answer:
Case Context: Mahalwari involved village heads, while Ryotwari taxed individual farmers.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • Mahalwari caused heavy debt for villages.
  • Ryotwari in South India burdened small farmers.
  • Both systems led to famines.
Current Relevance: Modern cooperatives (e.g., Amul) show better collective farming models. Examples: British Punjab, Madras Presidency, and today’s Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs).
Question 11:
The Blue Rebellion showed peasant resistance. Case Context: Indigo farmers refused cultivation.

Analyze how this rebellion inspired other movements.
Answer:
Case Context: Farmers united against British planters in Bengal.
Historical/Geographical Analysis:
  • It inspired the Champaran Satyagraha by Gandhi.
  • Our textbook shows it exposed colonial exploitation.
  • Newspapers like Hindoo Patriot supported farmers.
Current Relevance: Modern movements like Andolans use similar unity. Examples: Narmada Bachao, Singur land protests, and Kerala’s Munnar farmers.
Question 12:

Read the following case study and answer the question:

In the late 18th century, the British introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were made the owners of the land and were required to pay a fixed revenue to the Company. However, many zamindars failed to pay the revenue, leading to their estates being auctioned.

Question: Why did the Permanent Settlement fail to benefit the peasants, and how did it impact the zamindars?

Answer:

The Permanent Settlement failed to benefit the peasants because:

  • The zamindars, now landowners, exploited peasants by demanding high rents to meet the fixed revenue demanded by the British.
  • Peasants had no ownership rights and could be evicted if they failed to pay rent.
  • The system did not account for crop failures or natural disasters, making life harder for peasants.

Impact on zamindars:

  • Many zamindars struggled to pay the fixed revenue, especially during poor harvests.
  • Their estates were auctioned if they failed to pay, leading to loss of power and status.
  • New buyers of these estates often lacked traditional ties to the land, worsening peasant conditions.
Question 13:

Read the following case study and answer the question:

During the British rule, indigo cultivation was forced upon Indian farmers in Bengal through the tinkathia system. Farmers were compelled to grow indigo on the best part of their land, leaving little space for food crops. This led to widespread resentment and the Blue Rebellion of 1859.

Question: Explain the tinkathia system and how it contributed to the Blue Rebellion.

Answer:

The tinkathia system was a method where:

  • Indian farmers in Bengal were forced to grow indigo on at least 3/20th (tinkathia) of their land.
  • They received very low prices for indigo, making it unprofitable.
  • The best fertile land was reserved for indigo, reducing food crop production.

Contribution to the Blue Rebellion:

  • Farmers faced extreme poverty due to unfair contracts and low earnings.
  • They revolted in 1859 by refusing to grow indigo and attacking factories.
  • The rebellion spread rapidly, forcing the British to appoint a commission and eventually abolish forced indigo cultivation.
Question 14:
Read the following case study and answer the question:

In the late 18th century, the British introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were made the owners of the land and were required to pay a fixed revenue to the Company. However, many zamindars failed to pay the revenue, leading to their lands being auctioned.

Why did the British introduce the Permanent Settlement? What were its consequences on the ryots (peasants)?

Answer:

The British introduced the Permanent Settlement to ensure a fixed revenue for the Company and create a class of loyal zamindars who would manage land revenue.

Consequences on ryots:

  • Ryots suffered as zamindars increased rents to meet fixed revenue demands.
  • Many peasants lost their lands due to inability to pay high rents.
  • Agriculture declined as zamindars focused on revenue rather than improving land.

This system led to widespread poverty and exploitation of peasants.

Question 15:
Analyze the case below and answer:

In the early 19th century, the British introduced the Ryotwari System in parts of Madras and Bombay Presidencies. Unlike the Permanent Settlement, this system recognized peasants (ryots) as owners of the land, but they paid revenue directly to the Company.

What were the advantages and disadvantages of the Ryotwari System for the peasants?

Answer:

Advantages:

  • Peasants (ryots) were recognized as landowners, giving them more security.
  • Revenue was fixed based on land quality, reducing arbitrary demands.

Disadvantages:

  • High revenue rates often forced peasants into debt or to sell their land.
  • Officials could increase revenue during poor harvests, causing hardship.

While the system aimed to be fair, it still placed heavy burdens on peasants due to strict British policies.

Question 16:
Read the following case and answer the questions that follow:

In the late 18th century, the British introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were made the owners of the land and were required to pay a fixed revenue to the Company. However, many zamindars failed to pay the revenue, leading to their estates being auctioned.

Q1. Why did the British introduce the Permanent Settlement?
Q2. What were the consequences of this system on the peasants?

Answer:

Q1. The British introduced the Permanent Settlement to ensure a fixed and steady income from land revenue. They believed that making zamindars the permanent owners would encourage them to improve agriculture and increase productivity, as they could keep any surplus revenue.

Q2. The consequences on peasants were severe:

  • Peasants were exploited by zamindars who demanded high rents to meet the fixed revenue.
  • Many peasants lost their lands due to inability to pay rents, leading to widespread poverty.
  • The system discouraged agricultural improvements as zamindars focused on extracting maximum revenue rather than investing in land.

Question 17:
Study the case below and answer the questions:

During the British rule, the Ryotwari System was implemented in parts of Madras and Bombay Presidencies. Unlike the Permanent Settlement, this system recognized peasants (ryots) as the owners of the land, but they paid revenue directly to the Company.

Q1. How was the Ryotwari System different from the Permanent Settlement?
Q2. What challenges did the ryots face under this system?

Answer:

Q1. The Ryotwari System differed from the Permanent Settlement in the following ways:

  • It recognized ryots (peasants) as landowners, whereas the Permanent Settlement gave ownership to zamindars.
  • Revenue was collected directly from ryots, not through intermediaries like zamindars.
  • The revenue was not fixed permanently but revised periodically, making it unpredictable for ryots.

Q2. The ryots faced several challenges:

  • High revenue demands often forced them into debt or to abandon their lands.
  • Frequent revisions of revenue rates created uncertainty and hardship.
  • Officials sometimes pressured ryots to grow cash crops like indigo, reducing food security.

Question 18:
Read the following case study and answer the question:

In the late 18th century, the British introduced the Permanent Settlement in Bengal. Under this system, zamindars were made the owners of the land and were required to pay a fixed revenue to the Company. However, many zamindars failed to meet the revenue demands, leading to their lands being auctioned.

Q: Why did the Permanent Settlement lead to hardships for the peasants? Explain two reasons.

Answer:

The Permanent Settlement caused hardships for peasants due to the following reasons:

  • High Revenue Demand: The zamindars were required to pay a fixed revenue to the British, regardless of crop yield. To meet this demand, they increased rents on peasants, making it difficult for them to survive.
  • No Ownership Rights: Peasants had no security of tenure. If they failed to pay rent, they were evicted, leading to loss of livelihood and increased poverty.

Additionally, since the revenue was fixed, zamindars had no incentive to improve agricultural conditions, further worsening the peasants' plight.

Question 19:
Read the following case study and answer the question:

The British introduced the Ryotwari System in parts of Madras and Bombay Presidencies. Unlike the Permanent Settlement, this system recognized peasants (ryots) as landowners but demanded high revenue directly from them.

Q: How did the Ryotwari System affect the peasants? Explain two consequences.

Answer:

The Ryotwari System impacted peasants in the following ways:

  • High Revenue Burden: Since revenue was collected directly from ryots, they faced excessive demands. In bad harvest years, many fell into debt or had to abandon their lands.
  • Uncertainty of Ownership: Although ryots were considered landowners, the British could increase revenue or take away land if payments were delayed, creating insecurity.

This system also discouraged long-term investments in agriculture, as peasants feared losing their land due to fluctuating revenue demands.

Question 20:
Read the following case study: In 1765, the East India Company became the Diwan of Bengal and started collecting revenue from farmers. They introduced the Permanent Settlement system in 1793, fixing revenue demands permanently. However, this led to widespread exploitation of peasants.

Based on the case, answer:

  • Why did the Permanent Settlement system fail to benefit the farmers?
  • How did this system impact the relationship between the Company and the zamindars?
Answer:

The Permanent Settlement system failed to benefit farmers because:

  • The revenue demand was fixed at a high rate, leaving little surplus for farmers after paying taxes.
  • Zamindars, who were made landowners, exploited peasants to meet the fixed revenue, leading to indebtedness and loss of land.

Impact on Company-zamindar relationship:

  • Zamindars became intermediaries, but many failed to pay the fixed revenue, leading to their displacement by the Company.
  • The Company prioritized revenue collection over peasant welfare, creating distrust among zamindars and farmers alike.

This system ultimately harmed agricultural productivity and rural economy.

Question 21:
Analyze the given scenario: Under the Ryotwari System, the British collected revenue directly from cultivators (ryots) in parts of Madras and Bombay Presidencies. The revenue rates were revised periodically, often increasing the burden on farmers.

Answer the following:

  • How was the Ryotwari System different from the Permanent Settlement?
  • What were the consequences of frequent revenue revisions under this system?
Answer:

Differences between Ryotwari System and Permanent Settlement:

  • In the Ryotwari System, revenue was collected directly from ryots (cultivators), whereas in the Permanent Settlement, zamindars acted as intermediaries.
  • The revenue rates were periodically revised in the Ryotwari System, unlike the fixed rates of the Permanent Settlement.

Consequences of frequent revisions:

  • Farmers faced uncertainty as revenue demands increased, leading to heavy debts.
  • Many ryots abandoned farming or sold their lands to moneylenders, worsening rural poverty.

This system disrupted traditional farming practices and increased peasant unrest.

Chat on WhatsApp